See.
Read the part, understand its surfaces, and turn raw CAD into geometric intent.
Robotics software engineer Available worldwide
From CAD geometry and motion planning to embedded control and real hardware. I build the entire path between intent and motion.
00 The premise
I work where disciplines collide: geometry becomes trajectories, trajectories become packets, and packets become physical movement.
The result is software that understands the machine above it—and the hardware below it.
01 One continuous system
Read the part, understand its surfaces, and turn raw CAD into geometric intent.
Generate a path, solve the arm, and prove reachability and clearance before the first joint moves.
Carry the trajectory through ROS2, CAN and motor control until mathematics becomes motion.
Measure what the real machine does, close the loop, and let evidence—not assumption decide what ships.
02 Selected work
Projects that cross simulation, software architecture and physical hardware—because a robot is not finished when the code compiles.
Pull a joint, attach a different one, and the robot discovers its new body. Distributed modules communicate over CAN while ROS2 and MoveIt2 rebuild the kinematic description at runtime.
CAD geometry becomes an oriented, collision-checked path aligned to the real part and driven on a Dobot CR10A.
A self-balancing platform built from the driver up: sensor fusion, six-step commutation and a deterministic PID loop.
LLM orchestration with deterministic engineering tools, source-backed claims and mandatory human approval before release.
03 Full vertical slice
I like the problems that live at the seams between disciplines—the ones nobody quite owns.
Turn shape and point clouds into something a robot can reason about.
Decide where the tool goes, whether the arm can reach, and how it gets there.
Carry intent into deterministic loops, buses and motor phases.
Build traceable software around the machine without asking AI to invent the physics.
04 Experience
Contract · Remote
CAD-to-robot weld path generation for a real collaborative arm, plus a retrieval-grounded engineering feasibility platform.
BYRSAN Makina · Istanbul
PLC/HMI control, DIN-compliant structural engineering, and the company's digital infrastructure from site to quote-management system.
Tezmaksan Makina · Istanbul
FANUC robot programming and cell validation on the production floor, alongside industrial IoT dashboards with .NET Core.
Yıldız Technical University · Pamukkale University
M.Sc. thesis on autonomous modular robotics. Academic work spans controls, HIL test design and rigorous V-model verification.
05 Start a conversation